Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6243/2019dismissed as infructuous

Ganesan, v. Seyad Masood,

2022-01-25Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6243 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.01.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6243 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.4114 of 2019 Ganesan ... Petitioner vs.

1.Seyad Masood 2.Minor.Sathana Sankar 3.Minor Karthivel (Minor respondents 2 and 3 represented by their mother/ guardian, the 1st respondent) ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C, to set aside the order passed in Crl.R.C.No.4 of 2018 on the file of the learned 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli dated 22.02.2019 as confirmed by the order passed in M.C.No.23 of 2012 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambasamudram dated 13.12.2017.

For Petitioner : Mr.Rajesh for Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents : Mr.T.Villavan Kothai Legal Aid Counsel for R2

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed, invoking Section 482 Cr.P.C., seeking to set aside the order passed in Crl.R.C.No.4 of 2018 dated 22.02.2019 pending on the file of the learned 4th Additional Sessions Court, Tirunelveli, confirming the order passed in M.C.No.23 of 2012 dated 13.12.2017 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambasamudram. 2.When the matter was taken up for hearing on 11.01.2022, on considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the matter was settled between the parties and that https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6243 of 2019 the petitioner and the first respondent are living together, this Court has directed the petitioner and the first respondent to appear before this Court through virtually.

3.In pursuance of the said order, the petitioner and the first respondent have appeared before this Court virtually and both of them have specifically stated that they are now living together. 4.Since the petition has been filed to set aside the order passed in Crl.R.C.No.4 of 2018 challenging the order passed in M.C.No.23 of 2012 and as the petitioner and the first respondent are now living together, nothing survives for further adjudication. 5.Recording the same, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Crl side) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) csm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:

1.The 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Tirunelveli.

2.The Judicial Magistrate Court, Ambasamudram. Crl.O.P.(MD)No.6243 of 2019 and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.4114 of 2019 25.01.2022 RD/CK(03.02.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2