Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/7772/2020disposed of

A.Selvam v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-08-07Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar2 pages

D.No.1/275, Paiyur, BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 07/08/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN CRL OP(MD). Nos.7772 & 7829 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.3812 & 3811 of 2020 1.A.Selvam 2.Marikkannu ... Petitioners/Accused Rank not known in Crl.OP(MD) No.7772 of 2020 Geethanjali ... Petitioner/Accused Rank not known in Crl.OP(MD) No.7829 of 2020 Vs The Inspector of Police, All Woman Police Station, Thirupathur, Sivagangai District.

Crime No.Not known of 2020 ...Respondent/Complainant in both petitions.

In Both Petitions:

For Petitioner : M/s.V.S.Kishok Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For Intervener : Mr.P.Vetrivel, Advocate.

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C. PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.Not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 498(A) of IPC, in Crime No. Not known of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners in-laws of the defacto complainant and her husband who was an employee in abroad. The petitioners said to have received jewels from the defacto complainant and the same was pledged. Hence the complaint. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

D.No.1/275, Paiyur,

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side).

4. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners filed an undertaking affidavit stating that the petitioners said to have pledged the jewels of the defacto complainant for family expenses and now, they are ready to redeem the jewels within a period of six months. Hence, he seek anticipatory bail.

5. The learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent police, on instructions, submitted that petition enquiry is pending against the petitioners before the respondent police.

6. Considering the rival submissions, the petitioners are directed to appear before the respondent police and file to undertaking affidavit before the respondent police and on receipt of the same, the respondent police is directed to close the enquiry. 7.Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petitions are closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. sd/- 07/08/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMAN POLICE STATION, THIRUPATHUR, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

2.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD). Nos.7772 & 7829 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD) Nos.3812 & 3811 of 2020 Date :07/08/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ TK/AKM/SAR.2/14.08.2020/2P/3C 2/2