Chinnaiah v. The Deputy Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.03.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Chinnaiah ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kandharvakottai Police Station, Pudukottai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the Respondents to grant necessary permission and provide adequate police protection for conducting the Village Cultural Program on 31.03.2023 at about 05.00 p.m. to 09.00 p.m. as part of the birthday celebration of Honble Tamil Nadu Chief Minister at P.Mari Ayya Ex.MLA Campus nearby Kalaignar Statue, Kandharvakottai, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representation, Dated 29.03.2023. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Sivabalan For Respondents : Mr.S.Manikandan Government Advocate (Crl. side) 1/5

O R D E R

The writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to grant necessary permission and provide adequate police protection for conducting the Village Cultural Program on 31.03.2023 at about 05.00 p.m. to 09.00 p.m. as part of the birthday celebration of Honble Tamil Nadu Chief Minister at P.Mari Ayya Ex.MLA Campus nearby Kalaignar Statue, Kandharvakottai, Pudukkottai District, by considering the petitioner's representation. Dated 29.03.2023.

2. Mr.S.Manikandan, learned Government Advocate (Crl. side), takes notice for the respondents. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that birthday celebration of Honble Tamil Nadu Chief Minister at P.Mari Ayya Ex.MLA Campus, nearby Kalaignar Statue, Kandharvakottai, Pudukkottai District, is going to be performed on 31.03.2023. Subsequent to the same, in order to conduct a cultural programme on 31.03.2023, they sought permission of the Police by giving a 2/5

representation dated 29.03.2023. But, the second respondent has not considered the said representation. Since no order was passed, the writ petitioner has come before this Court for the above said relief.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents would submit that he has no objection for granting permission to conduct a cultural programme subject to time restriction in between 07.00 p.m to 09.00 p.m. on 31.03.2023, and also submitted that the second respondent has received the representation of the writ petitioner and the same is pending for consideration.

5. I have considered the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondents.

6. It is brought to the notice of this Court that the Director General of Police, Tamil Nadu, Chennai had issued a circular memorandum in Rc.007301/Genl.I (1)/2019, dated 09.04.2019, along with instructions to the Inspectors of Police throughout Tamil Nadu for consideration of applications seeking permission for conducting cultural programme. 3/5

Therefore, in view of the detailed circular and guidelines issued by the Director General of Police, the second respondent is hereby directed to consider the representation of the writ petitioner, dated 29.03.2023 and pass suitable orders based on the above said circular, in the light of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side).

7. With the above direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

30.03.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No TM To 1.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District, Pudukottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kandharvakottai Police Station, Pudukottai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN, J TM Order made in Dated :30.03.2023 5/5