Sivakumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27/07/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN Sivakumar ... Petitioner/ Sole Accused Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Manamelkudi Police Station, Pudukottai District.
(Crime No.396 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.K.Gokul,Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 396 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 294(b), 323, and 506(i) of I.P.C., in Crime No.396 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to Panchayat election dispute between the parties, the petitioner scolded the defacto complainant using filthy language and hold the shirt of the defacto complainant and attacked him on his chest and also threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the complaint.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and due to Panchayat election motive he has been falsely implicated in this case. He 1/3
further submitted that this is case in counter. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.
5.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the injured was treated as out patient. He further submitted that this is case in counter. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that the injured was treated as out patient and this is a case in counter, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aranthangi, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, [a] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.
[b] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [e] If the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.
sd/- 27/07/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
2/3
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ARANTHANGI.
2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANAMELKUDI POLICE STATION, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.
4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.7795 of 2020 Date :27/07/2020 MS/VR/SAR-3/30.07.2020/3P.5C 3/3