Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/3619/2016ordered

U. Duraimanickam v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-03-01Honourable Mr Justice V. S. Ravi2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.03.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.S.RAVI Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3619 of 2016 U.Duraimanickam ..Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

.. Respondents Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to direct the respondent to file final report in Crime NO.96 of 2015 on the file of the second respondent police within stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

For Petitione :Mr.K.Baalasundharam For Respondent :Mr.P.Kandasamy Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent police to file final report in Crime NO.96 of 2015 on the file of the second respondent police within a stipulated time as fixed by this Court.

2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side).

3. It is clearly stated in the petition that the petitioner has preferred a private complaint on 11.04.2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Alangudi and thereafter a case has been registered by the second respondent in Crime No.96 of 2015 for the offences under Sections 147, 427, 294(b), 506(i) I.P.C. and 3(i) of PPD Act. Further it is also stated that the second respondent has not taken any action as contemplated under law. Furthermore, it is also stated that the petitioner has also submitted a representation by registered post on 03.02.2016 to the first respondent.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Under such circumstances, the petitioner is very much

correct in approaching this Court by stating that till this date, the second respondent has not taken any action as contemplated by law. The respondent police have also not stated any acceptable and sufficient reasons for not taking further action in accordance with law.

5. Considering the above mentioned facts and circumstances and also on perusal of material records, this Court directs the second respondent to take appropriate action as contemplated by law with regard to F.I.R in Cr.No.96 of 2015 dated 09.07.2015 within a period of two months from today without fail. This Criminal Original Petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/ Assistant Registrar (Crl.Side) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar ssl To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Pudukkottai District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Keeramangalam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.K.Baalasundharam, Advocate SR.No.11590 CN/JGB-DP/9.03.2016/2P-5C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.3619 of 2016 01.03.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/