← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6884/2026allowed

Arumugam, v. The Ii Class Executive Magistrate Cum Revenue Thasildar,

2026-06-04Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.06.2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.OP.(MD)No.6884 of 2026 and Crl.M.P(MD)No.7433 of 2026 Arumugam

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The II Class Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Thasildar, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.

2. State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town Police Station, Tenkasi District.

(LIR No.11 of 2026)

...Respondents

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS Act, to call for the records of the 1st respondent, vide his proceedings in M.C.No.A1/41/2026 (107) dated 11.02.2026 and quash the same. For Petitioner : M/s.M.Karthikeya Venkitachalapathy For Respondents : M/s.P.Samuel Gunasingh Counsel for State of TN(Crl.side) * * * * * 1/5

ORDER

The present petition has been filed seeking to quash the summons issued under Section 129 of BNSS.

2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, he is involved in 17 criminal cases and the same is pending and he has not been convicted in any one of the criminal cases.

3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner relies upon a decision of this Court in Crl.OP(MD)No.20725 of 2021, dated 11.01.2022, M.Thangamalai and 2 others, Vs. Sub Divisional Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer and another, wherein this Court was pleased to hold that only when the person is declared as the habitual offender as contemplated under Section 2(4) of Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948, Section 129 can be invoked.

4. I have considered the submissions made on either side and perused the materials available on record.

2/5

5. As rightly pointed out by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner, so far he has not been convicted in any one of the criminal cases and therefore, the petitioner would not fall within the definition of habitual offender as contemplated under Section 2(4) of the Tamil Nadu Restriction of Habitual Offenders Act, 1948 and in such circumstances, the summons have been issued under Section 129 of BNSS without any jurisdiction and therefore, the same is liable to be quashed.

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands allowed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. 04.06.2026 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No RJR 3/5

To

1. The II Class Executive Magistrate cum Revenue Thasildar, Sankarankovil, Tenkasi District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Sankarankovil Town Police Station, Tenkasi District.

Copy to:- The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

R.VIJAYAKUMAR , J.

RJR Crl.OP.(MD)No.6884 of 2026 04.06.2026 5/5