← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/838/2021closed

Ubaithur Rahman, v. Dr.D.Faritha Banu,

2021-07-27Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam,Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

Cont.P(MD)No.838 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :27.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. THARANI Cont.P(MD)No.838 of 2021 in W.P.(MD).No.19684 of 2018 Ubaithur Rahman : Petitioner Vs.

1.Dr.D.Faritha Banu, Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, No.1, Jaffar Syrang Street, Vallal Sethakathi Nagar, Mannady, Chennai-600 001.

2.Mr.Kaiser 3.Mr.Peer Mohamed 4.Mr.Syed Santhu Mohamed 5.Mr.M.Asikraja : Contemnors PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnors for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order dated 16.09.2019 passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.19684 of 2018.

Prayer in WP(MD). 19684/ 2018 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 3 to remove the seal and unlock the over lock put by the respondents 7 to 10 in the petitioners shop in Door No.79, Gandhi Road, Palani Town, Dindigul District and to take action upon the respondents 7 to 10 by considering the representation of the petitioner dated 05.09.2018 For Petitioner : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar *****

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.) This contempt petition has been filed alleging that there is a wilful disobedience of the order and direction passed in W.P. (MD).No.19684 of 2018 dated 16.09.2019.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont.P(MD)No.838 of 2021 2.We have perused the order and directions issued in W.A.No.661 of 2019 dated 16.09.2019.

3.Pursuant to the directions, the Chief Executive Officer of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board has passed an order dated 29.11.2019. 4.According to the petitioner, this order does not conclude the proceedings and Special Officer has been appointed. If that is so the petitioner should challenge the said order. There is no contempt. Hence, the contempt petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tta/rm Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. +1 CC to M/s.AJMAL ASSOCIATES, Advocate ( SR-24166[F] dated 28/07/2021 ) Cont.P(MD)No.838 of 2021 27.07.2021 RD(4.08.2021) 2P 2C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2