Madras High CourtWP(MD)/8162/2020dismissed as infructuous

S.Revathi, v. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police

2020-08-03Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan2 pages

W.P.(MD)No.8162 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.08.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN W.P.(MD)No.8162 of 2020 S.Revathi ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dindigul Range, Dindigul.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents to conclude the preliminary enquiry on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.06.2020 and take further action based on the petitioner's representation dated 08.06.2020.

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Mayilvahanarajendran For Respondents : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to direct the respondents to conclude the preliminary enquiry on the petitioner's complaint dated 08.06.2020.

2.Today, when the petition is came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents would submit that on the complaint given by the petitioner, after due enquiry, the third respondent police has registered a case in crime No.865 of 2020, date 29.07.2020 for the offence punishable under Sections 406 and 420 IPC and hence, the prayer sought for by the petitioner has become infructuous.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

W.P.(MD)No.8162 of 2020 3.Recording the submissions of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-II) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) gns Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

1. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Dindigul Range, Dindigul.

2. The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

3. The Inspector of Police, Dindigul Taluk Police Station, Dindigul District.

W.P.(MD)No.8162 of 2020 03.08.2020 CS(02.09.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2