A.Rajalakshmi v. The Director General Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 14.06.2021 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN A.Rajalakshmi ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Director General of Police, Santhome,
2. The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID,
4. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
5. The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District, Dingiul.
... Respondents Prayer : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to withdraw the Crime No.1036 of 2020 dated 06.10.2020 on the file of the fifth respondent and transfer the investigation to any other investigation agency particularly the third respondent. For Petitioner : Mr.S.J.Chakravarthy For Respondents : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi, Additional Public Prosecutor.
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed seeking to withdraw the Crime No.1036 of 2020 dated 06.10.2020 on the file of the fifth respondent and transfer the investigation to any other investigation agency particularly the third respondent.
2. The case of the petitioner is that she is the wife of the deceased namely Arjunan and he gave a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- to the concerned Advocate to settle the loan amount, obtained from Muthoot 1/3
Finance, Madurai Branch. But the Advocate did not pay the amount and the amount was not settled. Hence, the above said crime was reported and Sasikumar Advocate was shown as accused in the above said crime. Further, the above Advocate filed a petition seeking Anticipatory bail before the Principal Session Judge, Dindigul and the same was dismissed in both occasions. The fifth respondent did not take any proper steps to investigate the case and hence, the petitioner prays to transfer the investigation from the file of the fifth respondent to any other investigating officer. Hence, this petition.
3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that, so far, the statements of four witnesses have been recorded and the investigation is taken in a proper manner and the fifth respondent is ready to file the final report, within time is stipulated by this Court. I find no valid reason to transfer the Investigation.
4. Recording the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the fifth respondent is directed to complete the investigation within a period of five months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and file the final report before the concerned jurisdiction court.
5. With these directions, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) kmm Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To
1. The Director General of Police, Santhome, 2/3
2. The Inspector General of Police, South Zone, Madurai.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID,
4. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.
5. The Inspector of Police, Thadikombu Police Station, Dindigul District, Dingiul.
6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1 CC to M/s.S.J.CHAKKARAVARTHY, Advocate(SR-19223[F] dated 14/06/2021) Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7122 of 2021 14.06.2021 RK (01.09.2021) 3P 8C 3/3