← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/1744/2015disposed of

S. Manonmani, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2015-02-12Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.02.2015 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition (MD) Nos.1744 and 1745 of 2015 1.S.Manonmani ... Petitioner in W.P.No.1744 of 2015 2.Muthupandi ... Petitioner in W.P.No.1745 of 2015 Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to Government, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai.

3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

... Respondents in both W.Ps.

Common Prayer :

Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay special allowance of Rs.750 with effect from 01.06.2006 notionally and from 01.01.2011 with monetary benefit as per the G.O. Ms. No. 23 Finance (Pay Cell) Department dated 12.01.2011 with all consequential benefits to the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Panneer Selvam for M/s.C.S. Associates For Respondents : Mr.V.Muruganandam, Additional Government Pleader.

ORDER

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.V.Muruganandam, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. By consent, the writ petitions are taken up for final disposal at the admission stage.

2.In both the writ petitions, the petitioners sought for a Mandamus directing the respondents to pay special allowance of Rs.750/- with effect from 01.06.2006 notionally and from 01.01.2011 with monetary benefit as per G.O.Ms.No.23 Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 12.01.2011 with all consequential benefits to the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.Whether the petitioners are entitled to such relief or not is for the respondents more particularly, the second respondent to consider and decide and therefore, this Court at this stage, is not expressing any view on the claim made by the petitioners.

4.It is seen that the petitioners have already made representations to the second respondent on 19.11.2014 and 20.02.2014 seeking for the very same benefit.

5.Accordingly, the writ petitions are disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the said representations and pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(T & P) \\True copy\\ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Director of Elementary Education, Chennai.

3.The District Elementary Educational Officer, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Assistant Elementary Educational Officer, Kadaladi, Ramanathapuram District.

+2 CC TO M/S.C.S.ASSOCIATES SR.NO.7142 & 7143 +1 CC TO THE SPL.GOVT.PLEADER SR.NO.6798 Writ Petition (MD) Nos.1744 and 1745 of 2015 12.02.2015 SMS NA/19/02/2015/P2/8C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/