← Library
Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/1036/2025closed

M.Murugan v. Dr. M.Sai Kumar, I.A.S.

2025-04-08Honourable Mr Justice R.Vijayakumar4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR CONT.P(MD)No.1036 of 2025 in W.P(MD) No.2844 of 2024 M.Murugan ... Petitioner/Petitioner - Vs1. M.Sai Kumar, I.A.S., Additional Chief Secretary cum Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Commissionerate of Revenue Administration, and Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2. E.Sundaravalli, I.A.S., The Director of Collegiate Education, Directorate of College Education, Institute of Advance Study in Education Campus, 577, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 006.

... Contemnors / Respondents 1 and 2 PRAYER: Contempt Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents herein for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Court in W.P(MD) No.2844 of 2024, dated 11.12.2024.

1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Kirubakaran for M/s.B.Saravanan Associates For Respondents : Mr.R.Baskaran Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mr.M.Sidharthan Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging violation of the orders of this Court, dated 11.12.2024 made in W.P(MD) No.2844 of 2024, wherein, this Court has directed the second respondent to consider the objections raised by the writ petitioner with regard to the recommendations made by the first respondent touching upon the alteration of date of birth.

2. Pursuant to the orders of this Court, the petitioner is said to have made his objections to the second respondent and the second respondent has issued proceedings dated 03.03.2025 accepting the recommendations of the first respondent and rejected the request of the petitioner for actuation of date of birth.

2/4

3. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, no independent reasons have been assigned by the second respondent for accepting the orders of the first respondent. This Court is of the considered opinion that such a ground cannot be raised in the contempt proceedings and if he is so advised, the order of the second respondent dated 03.03.2025 can be challenged in a manner known to law.

4. With the above said observation, this Contempt Petition stands closed.

08.04.2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No NCC : Yes/No ebsi To

1. The Additional Chief Secretary cum Commissioner of Revenue Administration, Commissionerate of Revenue Administration, and Disaster Management, Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005.

2. The Director of Collegiate Education, Directorate of College Education, Institute of Advance Study in Education Campus, 577, Anna Salai, Saidapet, Chennai - 600 006. 3/4

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

ebsi CONT.P(MD)No.1036 of 2025 08.04.2025 4/4