A.Naveen v. The Superintendent Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 28.03.2025 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL A.Naveen ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Trichy.

2. The State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police, Tha.Pettai Police Station Tha.Pettai, Trichy.

3. Ravi

4. Manikandan ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other or direction in the nature of Writ, direct the 2nd Respondent to consider the petitioners representation dated.20.03.2025 and to complete the enquiry within the time frame fixed by this Court.

1/5

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Arunraj For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to second respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated.20.03.2025 and to complete the enquiry.

2.According to the petitioner, he is the owner of the property in S.Nos.274/6A2, 276/3B and 274/3E to an extent of 1.23 acres at Arachi Revenue Village, Musiri Taluk, Trichy District. While so, the third respondent, who is the brother of the petitioner's mother, having properties adjacent to the petitioner's land attempted to fence the common pathway and abused the petitioner in obscene words and assaulted him. Therefore, the petitioner sent the representation dated 20.03.2025, but the same has not been considered. Hence this petition. 3.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the 2/5

respondent police would submit that earlier, the petitioner's mother lodged a complaint against the same private respondents and the same was closed after enquiry and again the petitioner, who is none other the son of the complainant in the previous complaint lodged the present complaint. However, the petitioner's representation is under consideration and for the same enquiry will be completed within a period of one week.

4.Considering the limited scope of the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court, without even issuing notice to the private respondents, is inclined to pass order.

5.According to the petitioner, he lodged a complaint before the second respondent and same was not considered. The second respondent admitted the receipt of the complaint and the same is under enquiry. 6.Therefore, the second respondent is directed to complete the enquiry upon the petitioner's complaint and dispose of the same within a period of one week from the date of this order in accordance with law. 3/5

7.With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of. 28.03.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No LR To

1. The Superintendent of Police, O/o. the Superintendent of Police, Trichy.

2. The State Rep.By, the Inspector of Police, Tha.Pettai Police Station Tha.Pettai, Trichy.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P.DHANABAL , J.

LR 28.03.2025 5/5