← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9085/2019dismissed as infructuous

Mumtaj v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-11-26Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9085 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 26.11.2021 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9085 of 2019 Mumtaj ... Petitioner/Mother of the Detenue Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

(In Crime No.182 of 2019) 3.Nijamudeen

...Respondents

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter namely Jesima, daughter of Jahir Hussain aged about 29 years before this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah For Respondents : Mr.R.Sivakumar Government Advocate (Crl.side) For R1 and R2

ORDER

This petition is filed seeking direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to produce the body or person of the petitioner's daughter namely Jesima, daughter of Jahir Hussain aged about 29 years before this Court.

2.When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) would submit that based upon the complaint given by the petitioner, enquiry was undertaken in Crime No.182 of 2019 and during the course of enquiry, the victim girl/Jesima appeared before the enquiry officer and gave a statement that on her own violation she went along with one Rajini and married him on 25.03.2019 and accordingly, it was closed. The petitioner also gave a statement that no further action is necessary on her complaint.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9085 of 2019 3.Recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that the complaint given by the petitioner came to be closed, nothing survives for further consideration or direction in this petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AD-I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tta Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, O/o.the Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadayanallur Police Station, Tirunelveli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9085 of 2019 26.11.2021 NSN(CO) GC(05.01.2022) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2