Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9204/2019disposed of

C.Ravi Chandren, v. The Inspector Of Police,

2019-07-08Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 08/07/2019 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.RAJAMANICKAM CRL OP(MD). No.9204 of 2019 C.Ravi Chandren,, ... Petitioner/Accused No.1 Vs The State rep.by The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Manaparai, Trichy District.

Crime No.4 of 2019.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.A.Sankara Ramasubramanian, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.V.Neelakandan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.4 of 2019 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed by the petitioner/ accused no.1 seeking bail for the alleged offence under Sections 3(c),4,5(i), 6 of POCSO Act and Section 506(i) of IPC.

2. Heard both sides

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit due to previous enmity the defacto complainant has lodged a false complaint against the petitioner herein. He further submitted that the petitioner herein was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 10.05.2019 and he is in custody for the past 58 days. Therefore he prayed to grant bail to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner herein is the father of the defacto complainant, who is aged about 14 years. The allegation against the petitioner is that he attempted to have sexual intercourse with her daughter. Hence he strongly opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. On a perusal of the 164 Cr.P.C statement, it is seen that the defacto complainant has reiterated the same as given in her complaint.

6. Taking into consideration of the aforesaid facts and also the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor and also the offence said to have been committed by the petitioner is heinous in nature, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Hence the bail petition is dismissed.

sd/- 08/07/2019 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MANAPARAI, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2.THE SUPERINDENTENT , CENTRAL PRISON, TRICHY.

3. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.A.SANKARA RAMA SUBRAMANIAN, Advocate ( SR-11317[I] dated 09/07/2019 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9204 of 2019 Date :08/07/2019 aav AE/JC/SAR-II (15.07.2019) 2P 5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/