Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/592/2020closed

K.Vidhyaa Dharan v. Murugesan

2021-07-12Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani2 pages

Cont.P.(MD)No.592 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 12.07.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE V.M.VELUMANI Cont.P.(MD)No.592 of 2020 K.Vidhyaa Dharan ... Petitioner/Petitioner vs.

1.Mr.Murugesan, Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 016.

2.Mr.Rajeswaran, General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., Madurai Region, Bye Pass Road, Madurai - 625 016.

...Contemnors/Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the contemnors/respondents for their willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court dated 02.01.2020 in W.P.(MD)No.27318 of 2019.

Prayer in WP(MD). 27318/ 2019 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court directing the respondens to pay the service surrender leave salary amount of Rs.44,046/- payable to the petitioner for the period from 2009-2018 together with 18 percent interest from the date of his retirement i.e., 31.5.2018 to till the date of payment and all other attendant benefits to him within the stipulated period.

For Petitioner :

Mr.A.Rahul For Respondents :

Mr.J.Senthilkumaraiah, Standing Counsel

ORDER

The present Contempt Petition has been filed alleging non compliance of the order dated 02.01.2020, made in W.P.(MD)No.27318 of 2019.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont.P.(MD)No.592 of 2020

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and respondents submitted that the order of this Court dated 02.01.2020, made in W.P.(MD)No.27318 of 2019, has been complied with.

3. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsm Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

Cont.P.(MD)No.592 of 2020 12.07.2021 MGJ(22.07.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2