← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/18878/2018ordered

Jeyakumar @ Jayakumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-10-24Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Fourth day of October Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP(MD) No.18878 of 2018 1.JEYAKUMAR @ JAYAKUMAR 2.PUTHURAJA @ ESAKKI PUTHURAJA ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 & 2 Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VILATHIKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI.

CRIME NO.156 OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.V.NIRMAL KUMAR, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.A.P.G.OHM CHAIRMA PRABHU, Govt.Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 294(b) and 506(ii) of I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Woman Act, 2002 in Crime No.156 of 2018, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity between them, the petitioners abused the de-facto complainant and her husband. Hence, the complaint.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners made a complaint before the respondent police against the de-facto complainant. It is case of case in counter. He would further submit that the petitioners did not commit any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays for anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) submitted that no one sustained injury in that occurrence. He would further submit that the petitioners are having no previous case. 5.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vilathikulam, Thoothukudi District and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 24/10/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRTE, VILATHIKULAM, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKUDI.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VILATHIKULAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.V.NIRMAL KUMAR Advocate SR.No.20196.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.18878 of 2018 Date :24/10/2018 RAM/MMS/SAR 4/30.10.2018/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/