Umar Farook v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Fifth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.10291 of 2018 UMAR FAROOK ... PETITIONER Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI IN CRIME NO.498 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : Mr.K.K.KANNAN, Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.ROBINSON, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Section 379 I.P.C. in Crime No.498 of 2017, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner is having previous cases that are all similar in nature.

4.Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- 25/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELAPALAYAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI.

2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to Mr.K.K.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.11221

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10291 of 2018 Date :25/06/2018 PK/RR-CSL/SAR-1/29.06.2018 : 2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/