Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9681/2019disposed of

P.Murugeswari v. The Commissioner Of Police

2019-07-09Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.07.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9681 of 2019 P.Murugeswari ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police Madurai District 2.The Inspector of Police Anna Nagar Police Station (L&O) Madurai District

3. Mr.Thavamani Sub Inspector of Police Anna Nagar Police Station (L&O) Madurai District ....Respondents Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the 2nd respondent not to harass the petitioner in the name of enquiry.

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Sukumar For Respondents 1 &2 : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

2.The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner is doing vegetable business in Anna Nagar, 2nd East Main Road,Madurai. In the year 2013, one Blessing Agro Farm Indian Limited, introduced a scheme that, if one time deposit of sum of Rs.1000/- is made, after five years a sum of Rs.84,000/- will be given to the depositors. The petitioner deposited a sum of Rs.1000/-. Subsequently, one Lakshmi who is well known to the petitioner has approached the petitioner and joined the above chit scheme. Thereafter, the above said Company misappropriated the fund, the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

said Chit fund was also closed. Now the said Lakshmi is harassing the petitioner to pay the deposited amount and she has also lodged a complaint before the second respondent police. Based on the complaint, the second respondent police is harassing the petitioner under the guise of enquiry. Hence, the present Criminal Original Petition has been filed.

3.As per direction of this Court, the third respondent appeared in person before this Court today stating that based on the complaint, enquiry has been conducted and he is not harassing the petitioner.

4.Considering the fact that based on the complaint given by one Lakshmi, now only an enquiry has been conducted by the respondents 2 and 3 and they are not harassing the petitioner, no further order is required in this case. However, the respondents 2 and 3 are directed not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.

5.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AE) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To:

1.The Commissioner of Police Office of the Commissioner of Police Madurai District 2.The Inspector of Police Anna Nagar Police Station (L&O) Madurai District

3. The Sub Inspector of Police Anna Nagar Police Station (L&O) Madurai District 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 cc Mr.B.SUKUMAR ,Advocate, SR.No.74785 Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9681 of 2019 09.07.2019 MSA KK/SAR/25.07.2019/2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/