R. Muthukumar v. The Superintending Engineer
WMP(MD) No.7812 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Special Original Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Thirty First day of July Two Thousand Twenty PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN WMP(MD) No.7812 of 2020 IN WP(MD) No.8411 of 2020 R.MUTHUKUMAR ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER Vs 1 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, HIGHWAYS (CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINANCES), TRICHY CIRCLE, TRICHY.
2 THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (QUALITY CONTROL), HIGHWAYS, TRICHY.
3 PALANI SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, HIGHWAYS (CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINANCES), TRICHY CIRCLE, TRICHY.
4 NIRMALA THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (QUALITY CONTROL) HIGHWAYS, TRICHY.
5 MMG INFRA TECH PRIVATE LIMITED, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, MURUGESAN, CONTRACTOR, NO,47,EZHIL NAGAR, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to pass an order of interim Injunction thereby restraining the 1st respondent from settling any bill in favour of the 5th respondent pending disposal of this writ petition.
ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.P.GANAPATHI SUBRAMANIAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.S.R.RAJAGOPALAN, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.RAJARAJAN, Government Advocate on behalf of the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
WMP(MD) No.7812 of 2020 Respondents 1 and 2, while admitting the Writ Petition, the court made the following order:- Heard Mr.P.Ganapathi Subramanian, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.S.R.Rajagopalan, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.M.Rajarajan, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.
2.The learned Additional Advocate General states that the tender process has already been over and the work order was issued on 15.07.2020. He further states that the work has already been started and it progress to some extent also. Therefore, the question of granting an order of interim injunction does not arise. Hence, the interim injunction application is dismissed. However, the rejection order passed by the authority has to be examined. List the matter on 21.08.2020.
sd/- 31/07/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO 1 THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, HIGHWAYS (CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAINANCES), TRICHY CIRCLE, TRICHY.
2 THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER (QUALITY CONTROL), HIGHWAYS, TRICHY.
ORDER
IN WMP(MD) No.7812 of 2020 IN WP(MD) No.8411 of 2020 Date :31/07/2020 MSA TE/SKN/SAR-III : 03/08/2020 : 2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2