← Library
Madras High CourtWA(MD)/1747/2025dismissed

The District Educational Officer v. M.Ponnamaal

2026-03-26Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jothiraman5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 26.03.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and C.M.P.(MD)Nos.9769, 9771 & 9772 of 2025 1.The District Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Headmaster, Government Middle School, Vellamadam, Vellamadam Post, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

... Appellants in W.A.(MD)No.1747/2025 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Headmaster, Government Middle School, Aral Perumalpuram, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District, ... Appellants in W.A.(MD)No.1748/2025 1.The Chief Educational Officer, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

1/5

2.The Headmaster, Government Middle School, Kodungulam, Kanyakumari District, ... Appellants in W.A.(MD)No.1749/2025 Vs.

M.Ponnamaal ... Respondent in W.A.(MD)No.1747/2025 P.Sridevi ... Respondent in W.A.(MD)No.1748/2025 R.Selvakili ... Respondent in W.A.(MD)No.1749/2025 COMMON PRAYER:- Writ Appeals filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, to set aside the order dated 21.09.2023 made in W.P. (MD).No.23079 of 2023, dated 22.09.2023 made in W.P.(MD)No.23257 of 2023 and dated 26.09.2023 made in W.P.(MD)No.23532 of 2023 on the file of this Court.

For Appellants : Mr.R.Baskaran, (In all W.As) Addl. Advocate General Assisted by Mr. J.Ashok, Addl. Govt. Pleader For Respondent : Mr.R.Maheswaran (In all W.As) 2/5

COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) These Writ Appeals have been filed challenging the order of learned Single Judge, directing the appellants herein to consider the representations of the respondents/Writ Petitioners, in the light of G.O.Ms.No.111, School Education Department, dated 09.05.2012

2. The learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the appellants would submit that the representations of the respondents/Writ Petitioners have been considered and orders have been passed rejecting the request of the respondents/Writ Petitioners. Therefore, nothing survives in these Writ Appeals.

3. In view of the above, as the impugned orders merely directed the authorities to consider the representations of the respondents/Writ Petitioners, it is the duty of the appellants to consider the same. Admittedly, the appellants have now considered the representations and pass orders. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication in these Writ Appeals.

3/5

4. Accordingly, all these Writ Appeals are dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[N.S.K., J.] & [M.J.R., J.] 26.03.2026 Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No vsm 4/5

N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

vsm 26.03.2026 5/5