← Library
Madras High CourtCRL RC(MD)/448/2020allowed

Thiyagarajan v. The Sub Divisional Magistrate Cum Revenue Divisional Officer

2020-08-13Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 13.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI and Crl.M.P.(MD)No.3914 of 2020 Thiyagarajan, S/o Ganeshan ... Petitioner / Petitioner Vs.

1.The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thirugokaranam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

... Respondents / Complainant Prayer : This Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and Section 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.A3/2338/2020, dated 20.05.2020 and set aside the same. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Mathavan For Respondents : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This revision has been filed to set aside the order dated 20.05.2020, in Na.Ka.No.A3/2338/2020, passed by the first respondent.

2. A case was registered against the petitioner, on 18.02.2020, in Crime No.94 of 2020 under Section 110 Cr.P.C., and proceedings were taken by the first respondent in M.C.No.29/2020 on 27.02.2020 and the petitioner executed a bond to maintain peace for a period of one year. Within that period, i.e. on 18.05.2020, the petitioner involved in criminal case in Crime No.423 of 2020 under Sections 294(b) and 307 I.P.C. The second respondent requested the 1/3

first respondent to take proceeding under Section 122 (1) (b) of Cr.P.C. and thereafter, the first respondent passed the impugned order on 20.05.2020. Against that order, the petitioner preferred this Criminal Revision Case.

3. On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. The petitioner was not furnished with the copies of the documents. The petitioner was not given opportunity to put forth his case. No enquiry was conducted and the impugned order was passed and prayed the impugned order to be set aside.

4. On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that the petitioner has executed a bond on 27.02.2020, subsequently, on 18.05.2020, he involved in a criminal case in Crime No.423 of 2020 under Sections 294(b) and 307 I.P.C. The petitioner is a habitual offender, having three previous cases. Taking note of the previous antecedents of the petitioner and after persuing the documents, the impugned order was passed by the first respondent and prayed the Revision to be dismissed.

5. Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.

6. It is seen that there are three previous cases against the petitioner, but, a perusal of the impugned order reveals that no show cause notice was issued to the petitioner. No enquiry was conducted. No opportunity was given to the petitioner. In the above circumstances, the impugned order, dated 20.05.2020, in Na.Ka.No.A3/2338/2020, passed by the first respondent, is hereby set aside. This Criminal Revision Case is allowed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. 2/3

To 1.The Sub Divisional Magistrate cum Revenue Divisional Officer, Pudukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiurgakarnam Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Superintendent, Central Prison, Trichy.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

13.08.2020 Ls SDS (18.08.2020) 3P-5C 3/3