Murugan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4702 of 2016 1 MURUGAN 2 RAJU 3 ELANGOVAN 4 SIVAKUMAR 5 KARTHI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.2 TO 6 Vs STATE : THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINTHAMANIPATTI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.45/2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT) For Petitioner : M/S V.KANNAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C. in Crime No. 45 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.Side).
3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that A.1 and A.2 were already arrested and released on bail and the injured has also been discharged from the hospital and that there is no previous case as against these petitioners.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and also considering the fact that the injured has also been discharged from the hospital this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Kulithalai on condition that each of the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a] the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 06.30 p.m. until further orders;
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560].
(e) The Inspector of Police concerned, is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) whether the petitioners are complying with the order or not.
sd/- 24/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, KULITHALAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARUR DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CHINTHAMANIPATTI POLICE STATION, KARUR DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S V.KANNAN Advocate SR.No.16976 RL/6C/2P/NGM/SS/ARI/30/3/2016
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.4702 of 2016 Date :24/03/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/