Mohamed Abdul Rashid.A v. The Tamil Nadu Wakf Board
W.P.(MD).No.9395 of 2021 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 17.06.2021 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH W.P.(MD).No.9395 of 2021 and M.P.(MD).No.7104 of 2021 A.Mohamed Abdul Rashid
...Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Tamil Nadu Waqf Board, Represented by its Chief Executive Officer, No.1, Jaffer Syrang Street, Vallal Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai-1.
2. The Superintendent of Wakfs, Khader Auliya Mosque Complex, Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Tirunelveli Zone, 51/18, Thiruvanandapuram Road, Palayankottai, Tirunelveli District.
3. The wakf Inspector / Executive Officer, Tirunelveli / Kanniyakumari Incharge, No.8, Old Building, Junction Jumma Masjid, Kailasapuram, Tirunelveli.
4. Ramalan Kanji Committee, Represented by V.Umar Ali, No.8, Old Building, Junction Jumma Masjid, Kailasapuram, Tirunelveli.
... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the third respondent, dated 12.04.2021 in Na.Ka.No.S.02/Va.Aa/Ni.Aa/Ka.Committee/2021 and quash the same and consequently direct the second respondent to constitute Kanji Committee to Islamic Cultural Association Mosque at College Road, Nagercoil, Kanniyakumari District, as per the proceedings of the first respondent, dated 22.03.2021 and made in R.C.No.4735/19/C1/Gn1.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.A.Nissar Ahmed For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.S.A.Ajmal Khan https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2
W.P.(MD).No.9395 of 2021
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, the Writ Petition stands dismissed as infructuous.
No costs.
Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tsg NOTE:
In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. Order made in W.P.(MD).No.9395 of 2021 Dated:17.06.2021 ma(CO) TR(24.06.2021) 2P 1C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2