Mohammed Kaif v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.6323 of 2025

1. Mohammed Kaif 2.Harish Narayanan 3.Dhanush 4.A.Abishek 5.Dhayalan @ Raj Dhayalan ... Petitioners Vs

1. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station, Trichy City.

Crime No.606/2024.

2. Riyash Ahmmed ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records relating to FIR in Crime no.606 of 2024 dated 17.08.2024 on the file of the 1st Respondent Police and quash the same as against the petitioners. For petitioners : Mr.S.Vimal Raj Page No. 1 of 5

For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.J.Prabhu *****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to the First Information Report in Crime No.606 of 2024 dated 17.08.2024 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 191(2), 296(b), 118(2) and 351(3) of BNS, 2023 and quash the same.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

3. The defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and this Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defacto-complainant represented that they entered into a compromise and he has no objection to quash the FIR. A compromise memo, dated 31.03.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsel, is also filed before this Court. Page No. 2 of 5

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the first respondent would submit that in this case, Final Report was filed after conducting enquiry. Since the parties entered into compromise, the Final Report will not be taken on file as against these petitioners.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise along with the counter case, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

7. Recording the said compromise memo and also recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this petition is allowed and the First Information Report in Crime No.606 of 2024 dated 17.08.2024 on the file of the first respondent police is quashed as against these petitioners.

16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd Page No. 3 of 5

To 1.The Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station, Trichy City.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.6323 of 2025 16.04.2025 Page No. 5 of 5