Deepak v. The Commissioner Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:18.11.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM Crl.O.P(MD)No.478 of 2016 Deepak .. Petitioner vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station, Trichy.

3.Anvar Hussain .. Respondents Prayer:Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent not to interfere the business transaction between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and not to harass the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Veilkani Raju For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for R1 and R2

O R D E R

This petition has been filed, seeking a direction to the respondent police not to interfere the business transaction between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent and not to harass the petitioner.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the State.

3. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), the petiton enquiry has been conducted and it has been subsequently closed. He has further submitted that since the complaint has already been closed, there is no scope for harassment at all and they did not interfere in the Civil dispute of the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. sd/- Assistant Registrar (Writs) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar PJL To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Trichy City, Trichy District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Woraiyur Police Station, Trichy.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

GJM/EM/29.12.16-2p-4C Crl.O.P(MD)No.478 of 2016 18.11.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/