Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4800/2016withdrawn dismissed

V.Kamaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-03-18Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 18.03.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4800 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.2391 and 2392 of 2016 1.V.Kamaraj 2.V.Siranjeevi 3.T.Yogesh .. Petitioners/Accused 1 to 3 Vs 1.The Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station, Sattur.

(In Crime No.1098/2013) .. Respondent/Complainant 2.V.Geetharanjani .. Respondent/Defacto Complainant Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to Calendar Case No.86 of 2015 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur and quash the same.

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Pandi Maharaja For Respondents : Mrs.S.Prabha Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for R.1

O R D E R

When this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as sought for by the petitioners, the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Original Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to raise all the points before the trial Court. The trial Court is directed to expeditiously conduct the trial. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petitions are also dismissed.

3. At this juncture, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the presence of the petitioners before the Trial Court may be dispensed with.

4. Accepting the submission and considering the age of the petitioners 1 and 2, this Court directs the petitioners 1 and 2 to appear before the Trial Court for collecting the final report and other papers under Section 207 Cr.P.C., at the time of framing charges, for questioning under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and on the day of judgment. On all other dates, if the petitioners 1 and 2 file an application under Section 317 Cr.P.C., undertaking that they will not dispute their https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

identity and that their counsel will cross-examine the prosecution witnesses in their absence without adopting dilatory tactics, the Trial Court may liberally consider and entertain the same. If the petitioners 1 and 2 adopt any dilatory tactics, it is open to the Trial Court to insist upon their presence.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(P&A) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar(C.S) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate NO.II, Sattur.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sattur Town Police Station, Sattur.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.4800 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.2391 and 2392 of 2016 18.03.2016 ssl PA/GSV-PM/30.03.2016/2P/4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/