← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/4837/2016dismissed

Ganesan v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-03-21Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty First day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.4837 of 2016 1 GANESAN 2 RAJAN 3 PAPPURAJ 4 IYYAPPAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 3 TO 6 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJAPALAYAM NORTH POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 3 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.ARUN JAYATRAM Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 07.01.2016 and 02.1.2016 respectively, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 450, 294(b), 342, 324, 307, 302 and 506(ii) IPC in Crime No.3 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. Heard Mr.P.Arun Jayatram, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

3.This is a second bail application and the first bail application was dismissed on 08.03.2016. It is seen that the accused in this case, on account of previous enmity, have brutally attacked the husband of the de-facto complainant and the de-facto complainant resulted in the husband of the de-facto complainant succumbed to the injuries and the de-facto complainant got admitted to the hospital. On a reading of the FIR, the accused had gathered at the office of the de-facto complainant, on account of previous motive and have indiscriminately attacked her and her husband. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that investigation has been completed and final report has been filed.

That is not a good reason to grant bail, in the teeth of the serious nature of the allegations. Hence, this petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to approach this Court after committal proceedings are completed.

sd/- 21/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAJAPALAYAM NORTH POLICE STATION,VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT. 2 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, SUB JAIL, VIRUDHUNAGAR 3 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S P.ARUN JAYATRAM Advocate SR.No.15890

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.4837 of 2016 Date :21/03/2016 AA/JGB-DP/AR-I/23.03.2016/2p-5c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/