Soni @ Jeyaraman v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/05/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI Soni @ Jeyaraman ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, Town Police Station, Pudukkottai District.
Crime No. 186 of 2022.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s. Mathavan.G., Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.B.Nambi Selvan, Additional Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.
PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No. 186 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/ Accused No.3, who was arrested and remanded judicial custody on 21.04.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 392 and 397 of IPC, in Crime No.186 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the other accused have waylaid the defacto complainant and snatched a sum of Rs.2,000/- at the knife point and also assaultd him. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. 4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submits that the investigation is almost completed. He further submits that the petitioner is having three previous cases. 1/3
5.The investigation is almost completed with regard to the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody from 21.04.2022. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Pudukkottai. (i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;
(ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three months and thereafter as and when required for interrogation;
(iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial; (v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 19/05/2022 / TRUE COPY / 19/05/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO
1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, PUDUKKOTTAI.
2. DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PUDUKOTTAI DISTRICT.
2/3
3. THE OFFICER-INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, PUDUKKOTTAI.
4. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TOWN POLICE STATION, PUDUKKOTTAI DISTRICT.
5. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8077 of 2022 Date :19/05/2022 TTA USK/SVR/SAR-III/19.05.2022/3P/6C 3/3