Anandha Kumar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Fifth day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5005 of 2016 1 ANANDHAKUMAR 2 SASIKUAMAR ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.1 & 2 Vs STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALANI ADIVARAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT, (CR NO. 124 OF 2016). ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S N.MOHAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI,Govt.Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 03.03.2016 for the offences punishable under Section 341, 419, 420 and 383 IPC in Crime No.124 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. Heard Mr.N.Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

3. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations in the FIR against the petitioners herein, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to grant bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions:

(i) the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palani. [ii] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police every day at 10.30 a.m. and 6.30 p.m. until further orders. [iii] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[iv] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[v] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [vi] The Inspector of Police is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as to whether the petitioners are complying with the conditions or not. sd/- 05/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

3 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL,MADURAI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALANI ADIVARAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S N.MOHAN Advocate SR.No.18824

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5005 of 2016 Date :05/04/2016 PA/NGM-SS/SAR I/05.04.2016/2P/7C(IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/