← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8256/2020dismissed

R.Suresh Kumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2020-08-13Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan2 pages

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8256 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 13.08.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN Crl.O.P.[MD]No.8256 of 2020 R.Suresh Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, rep.by the Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvattar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.Sunil Kumar ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to direct the respondents to accord police protection to the petitioner to tape rubber plantation comprised in R.S.No.495/4, Attur Village, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari District, admeasuring 97cents (as per lie 89.376 cents).

For Petitioner : Mr.C.K.M.Appaji For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking a direction to direct the respondent police to accord police protection to the petitioner to tape rubber plantation in the land comprised in R.S.No.495/4, Attur Village, Thiruvattar Taluk, Kanyakumari District, admeasuring 97cents.

2.Today, when the petition is came up for hearing, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that for the same dispute, the petitioner herein on 17.06.2020, preferred a complaint before the second respondent and on receipt of the same, the the second respondent herein initiated an enquiry in C.S.R.No.423 of 2020. During the time of enquiry, on 08.07.2020, the petitioner himself submitted a letter to the second respondent as he has to approach the competent Court for resolving the dispute having by him with the third respondent. After receiving the said letter given by the petitioner, the enquiry has been closed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8256 of 2020 3.Now on considering the submission made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, it would reveal the fact that the present petition has been filed by the petitioner for the same relief as prayed in the petition dated 17.06.2020. So the attitude committed by the petitioner is nothing, but waste of time. Accordingly, the petition filed by the petitioner is devoid of merits.

4.In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar () // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) cp Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To:- 1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvattar Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.8256 of 2020 13.08.2020 VB (31.08.2020) 2P 4C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2