Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9930/2020closed

Karthick Raja v. The Revenue Divisional And Officer

2020-09-28Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:28.09.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN Crl.O.P.[MD]No.9930 of 2020 and Crl.M.P.(MD).No.4601 of 2020 1.Karthick Raja 2.Chelladurai 3.Vigneshvaran 4.Ponnysamy 5.Selvakumar ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Revenue Divisional Officer, cum First Class Administrative Magistrate, Ramanathapuram.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Dhiravidamani 4.Moorthy 5.Pasupathipandian 6.Madhavan 7.Rethinamoorthy ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for the records of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.A4/3917/2020, dated 11.07.2020 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Muthusamy For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.S.Chandrasekar Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed seeking the relief to call for the records pertains to the proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A4/3917/2020, dated 11.07.2020 pending on the file of the 1/3

first respondent and quash the same as illegal.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

3. Now on going through the summons issued by the first respondent, it appears that all the petitioners herein were directed to appear before him for the hearing dated 30.07.2020.

4. In this regard, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2, on instructions, would submit that for the above said hearing, all the petitioners herein (except the fourth petitioner) had appeared before the first respondent and therefore, the prayer sought for by the petitioners has become infructuous.

5. He would further submit that in respect to the fourth petitioner, in the report submitted by the first respondent, he has stated as since the said person (fourth petitioner) viz.,.Ponnysamy, is residing in Tiruppur, he could not appear before him for the said hearing date and therefore, the proceedings initiated against him was withdrawn.

6.Therefore, in view of the above, no further order is necessary in this Criminal Original Petition and accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS III) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tsg Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Sivagangai District. 2/3

2.The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch (Anti Land Grabbing Special Cell), Sivagangai District.

Crl.O.P.[MD]No.9930 of 2020 28.09.2020 RG(CO) KK(06.10.2020) 3P 3C 3/3