Karthick v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Fourth day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5175 of 2016 KARTHICK ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FORT STATION,TRICHY, CRIME NO NOT KNOWN OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S J.K.JEYASELAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehended arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 417, 376 I.P.C., in Crime No.Not Known of 2016, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard Mr.J.K.Jeyaselan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

3. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) has submitted that the respondent Police, after conducting enquiry, has registered a regular case, in Crime No.5 of 2016, on the complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, under Sections 294(b), 417, 376 and 506(ii) I.P.C.

4. In view of the submission of the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), this criminal original petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh anticipatory bail application by giving the Crime No.5 of 2016. sd/- 24/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, FORT STATION,TRICHY 2 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5175 of 2016 Date :24/03/2016 AA/JGB-DP/SAR-I/30.03.2016/2p-3c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/