Nateswari.M v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 16.08.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M.Nateswari : Petitioner Vs.

1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Secretary to Government, Finance, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Panagal Maligai, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

: Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to settle the terminal benefits such as gratuity, encashment of earn leave and un-earn leave salary, Special Provident Fund and General Provident Fund etc., due to her husband late Thiru.Murugesan, with statutory interest within the prescribed period. 1/4

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Balamurugan For Respondents : Mrs.Farjana Ghoushia Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that this Writ Petition has now become infructuous since the petitioner who is the wife of the deceased employee has sought leave to file writ appeal aggrieved by the order passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing the writ petition filed by the husband [deceased employee] while he was alive. The aforesaid fact is also confirmed by the learned Counsel for the petitioner.

2.In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous and the petitioner is directed to work out his remedy in the writ appeal. There shall be no order as to costs. 16.08.2024 Index :Yes / No Internet : Yes / No NCC : Yes/No MR 2/4

To 1.The Secretary to Government, State of Tamil Nadu, Finance, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Secretariat, Chennai.

2.The Commissioner, Treasuries and Accounts Department, Panagal Maligai, Chennai.

3.The District Collector, Namakkal District, Namakkal.

3/4

ABDUL QUDDHOSE , J.

MR 16.08.2024 4/4