S. Bhaskaran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twenty Eighth day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5302 of 2016 S. BHASKARAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, CR NO.268 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.R.KARTHIC RAJAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI,Govt.Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehended arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) I.P.C., and 379(NH), in Crime No.268 of 2016, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. Heard Mr.R.Karthic Rajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner / accused and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

3. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations made against the petitioner / accused and the fact that nobody has sustained injuries in this case, this Court is of the view that this is a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to him. Accordingly, he is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, on condition that the petitioner /accused shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(i) the petitioner / accused shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.

(ii)the petitioner / accused shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

(iii)the petitioner / accused shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

(iv)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner / accused https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner / accused released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

4. The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send a compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate, as to whether the petitioner is complying with the conditions or not. sd/- 28/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MELUR,MADURAI DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MELUR POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.R.KARTHIC RAJAN Advocate SR.No.16968

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5302 of 2016 Date :28/03/2016 PA/GSV-PM/AR I/29.03.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/