Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/807/2017disposed of

A.Jaishankar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-06-08Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam,Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 08.06.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN H.C.P.[MD].No.807 of 2017 A.Jaishankar : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli District, District Police Head Quarters, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Jambunathapuram Police Station, Jambunathapuram, Tiruchirappalli District.

: Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's minor son, Velan @ Sangeeth, S/o.A.Jaishankar, aged about 17 years, before this Court and to hand over his custody to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Narayanan For Respondents : Mr.C.Ramesh Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.] Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

2. The present Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the body and person of the petitioner's minor son, Velan @ Sangeeth, S/o.A.Jaishankar, aged about 17 years, before this Court and to hand over his custody to the petitioner.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. According to the petitioner, his son was missing from 23.04.2017, onwards. In this regard, the petitioner made a complaint before the second respondent police. On receipt of the said complaint, the second respondent police registered a case in Crime No.75 of 2017. Since there were no effective steps taken by the second respondent police to trace out the detenu, the petitioner has come up with the present Habeas Corpus Petition.

4. Today, when the Habeas Corpus Petition was taken up for hearing, the second respondent police produced the detenu. On enquiry, he has stated that on his own volition, he went to Thiruppur, where he was working in a private company. He has further stated that now he is willing to go along with his parents.

5. In view of the above, since the detenu is not in illegal custody, nothing survives for adjudication in the Habeas Corpus Petition. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Tiruchirappalli District, District Police Head Quarters, Tiruchirappalli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Jambunathapuram Police Station, Jambunathapuram, Tiruchirappalli District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

NB JS/KKR/SAR.3/20.6.2017/2P-4C ORDER MADE IN H.C.P.[MD].No.807 of 2017 08.06.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/