N. Muthukumar v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Twenty Ninth day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5348 of 2016 1 N. MUTHUKUMAR 2 N. RAMESH 3 N. MURUGAN 4 N. LAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 TO 4 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.
CRIME NO. 242 OF 2014 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.242 of 2014, on the file of the respondent police for offence under Sections 147, 148, 448, 294(B), 323, 324, 506(ii) of I.P.C., and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent.
3. It is seen that the investigation in Crime No.242 of 2014 has been completed and final report has been filed in C.C.No.4 of 2015 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srirangam and Nonbailable Warrant was issued on 29.01.2016 against these petitioners.
4. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations in the F.I.R., this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.
5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaigundam, Tuticorin https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
District, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police as and when required.
[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 29/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,SRIVAIGUNDAM, TUTICORIN 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TUTICORIN DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MURAPPANADU POLICE STATION,THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S S.SELVAKUMAR Advocate SR.No.17515
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.5348 of 2016 Date :29/03/2016 AA/JGB-DP/SAR-I/31.03.2016/2p-6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/