Ayyadurai@Udaiyan v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 11.08.2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI Ayyadurai @ Udaiyan ... Petitioner/Accused No.3 Vs The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thanjavur District.
In Crime No.70 of 2021.
... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.Deenadhayalan For Respondent : Mr.T.Senthil Kumar Government Advocate(Crl. side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime no.70 of 2021 on the file of the respondent Police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 of IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.70 of 2021 seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner had illegally transported 1/4 unit of river sand by using Bullock Cart. Hence, the complaint.
3. This Court by earlier order dated 20.05.2021, granted interim anticipatory bail to the petitioner and directed him to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- to the credit of Crime No.70 of 2021 before the Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District. 1/4
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has produced the receipt showing the payment made to the credit of Crime No.70 of 2021.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that the petitioner had illegally transported 1/4 unit of river sand without valid permit and opposed for grant of anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and also the fact that the petitioner has complied with the conditional order passed by this Court, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner and hence this petition is allowed.
7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:
[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[b]the petitioner shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 am. and 05.00 pm., until further orders. [c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
8.It is needless to say that any tool or instrument or vehicle used for illegal quarrying/ transportation of sand is liable to be seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and any vehicle or instrument or tool which 2/4
has been seized under Section 21 (4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, is liable to be confiscated under Section 21(4-A) of the Act.
9.Though the above provision mandates the authorities to confiscate the tool or instrument or vehicle involved in the commission of the offence of illegal quarrying/transportation of sand, the authorities have not invoked the provision of 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and therefore, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19936 of 2016, etc., batch has emphasized the need for confiscation of the vehicles. Consequently, the Government has also issued certain directions to the authorities of Revenue, Police, Forest, Geology and Mining departments to seize the vehicles and for confiscation of the same in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries MMC-II Department, dated 05.08.2020. Therefore, the respondent police is directed to proceed further as per Section 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and as per the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries MMC-II Department, dated 05.08.2020.
sd/- 11/08/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
mbi Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.
TO 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, Thanjavur District.
2.Do Through The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur District at Kumbakonam.
3/4
3.The Inspector of Police, Thiruchitrambalam Police Station, Thanjavur District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6773 of 2021 Date : 11.08.2021 TR/JC/SAR-IV (23.08.2021) 4P 5C 4/4