← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6841/2021ordered

Vanna Muthu v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2021-08-03Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 03/08/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.PUGALENDHI 1.Vanna Muthu 2.C.Shenbaga Moorthy ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 & 2 Vs The State rep.by The Sub Inspector of Police, Alwarthirunagari Police Station, Thoothukudi District Crime No.89 of 2021. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners : Mr.R.M.SURESH, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.T.SENTHILKUMAR, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- Mines and minerals for Anticipatory bail in cr.No.89 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 379 IPC and Sections 21(1), 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation)Act, 1957 in Crime No.89 of 2021, seek anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have illegally transported gravel sand. Therefore, the present case came to be registered.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioner are innocents and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

4.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners herein.

1/3

5.Considering the nature of offence and the fact that the petitioners have not indulged in any other offences, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikundam, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity.

[b]the petitioners shall report before respondent police daily at 10.30 am., until further orders.

[c]the petitioners shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [d]the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [f]If the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

7.It is needless to say that any tool or instrument or vehicle used for illegal quarrying/ transportation of sand is liable to be seized under Section 21(4) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and any vehicle or instrument or tool which has been seized under Section 21 (4) of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, is liable to be confiscated under Section 21(4-A) of the Act.

8.Though the above provision mandates the authorities to confiscate the tool or instrument or vehicle involved in the commission of the offence of illegal quarrying / transportation of sand, the authorities have not invoked the provision of 21 (4-A) of 2/3

the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and therefore, a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.19936 of 2016, etc., batch has emphasised the need for confiscation of the vehicles. Consequently, the Government has also issued certain directions to the authorities of Revenue, Police and Forest and Geology and Mining departments to seize the vehicles and for confiscation of the same in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-II) Department, dated 05.08.2020. Therefore, the respondent police is directed to proceed further as per Section 21 (4-A) of the Mines and Minerals(Development & Regulation) Act, 1957 and as per the guidelines issued in G.O.Ms.No.170, Industries (MMC-II) Department, dated 05.08.2020.

sd/- 03/08/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNDAM.

2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THOOTHUKKUDI DISTRICT.

3.THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ALWARTHIRUNAGARI POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.6841 of 2021 Date :03/08/2021 SA/VR/SAR.4/09.08.2021/3P/5C 3/3