← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/872/2017closed

Govindammal v. The Superintendent Of Police

2017-10-03Honourable Mr Justice R.Subbiah,Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 03.10.2017

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA H.C.P.[MD].No.872 of 2017 Govindammal : Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, 2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.Ashick : Respondents PRAYER: Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the detenu or her corpus namely Priyatharshini, Female, aged 19 years, D/o.Boominathan, before this Court and set her at liberty forthwith.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Uthayakumar For Respondents 1&2 : Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor For Respondent No.3 : No Appearance

O R D E R

*********** [Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH, J.] The present Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed by the mother of the detenu, seeking a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to produce the person or body of the detenu, namely, Priyatharshini, aged about 19 years, before this Court and set her at liberty.

2. According to the petitioner, her daughter is studying B.Sc. Chemistry at Syedthammal Arts College, Ramanathapuram. She is aged about 19 years. After completion of her semester examination, she returned back home and doing domestic work as usual. On 07.05.2017, at about 12.00 P.M, the mother of the detenu left the house for purchasing household articles. When she returned back https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

home, she found that her daughter/detenu was missing from home. In this regard, the petitioner made a complaint before the second respondent. On receipt of the said complaint, the second respondent police registered a case in Crime No.205 of 2017 under Woman Missing case.

3. Today, when the Habeas Corpus Petition was taken up for consideration, the second respondent police produced the detenu. On enquiry, she has stated that she is willing to go along with her mother.

4. In view of the above statement made by the detenu, nothing survives for adjudication in the Habeas Corpus Petition. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(C.O) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District, 2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Ramanathapuram Town Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

NB RL/4C/2P/KP/SAR1/11/10/2017 ORDER MADE IN H.C.P.[MD].No.872 of 2017 03.10.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/