← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/7938/2026allowed

Vijayakumar N v. The District Collector

2026-03-25Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P.(MD)No.6503 of 2026 N.Vijayakumar ... Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

2.The Assistant Engineer, TANGEDCO, Karaikudi Rural, Sivagangai District.

3.The President, Shankarapuram Panchayat, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District.

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call upon records relating to the impugned order, dated 13.03.2026 passed by the 2nd respondent on the application made by the petitioner's in Application reference No. 200054030326544 and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to grant the petitioner with an electricity service connection by considering her online application dated 1/5

12.03.2026 in Application reference No. 200054030326544 within a stipulated time fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner :Mr.T.Manikandan For R1 :Mr.S.Kameswaran Government Advocate For R2 :Mr.S.Deenadhayalan *****

O R D E R

The petitioner challenges the order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the second respondent, by which the petitioner's application for grant of temporary electricity service connection was rejected on the ground of pendency of court cases.

2. The petitioner had submitted an application seeking temporary electricity service connection for construction purposes. The said application came to be rejected by the second respondent through the impugned order.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the second respondent is unable to substantiate the existence of any pending court proceedings relating to the subject property, in which the petitioner is seeking 2/5

temporary electricity service connection, nor is there any order of restraint operating against the petitioner from obtaining such connection. In such circumstances, the rejection of the petitioner's application is arbitrary and unsustainable.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the impugned order dated 13.03.2026 passed by the second respondent is set aside. The second respondent is directed to provide temporary electricity service connection to the petitioner for the subject property, subject to the petitioner satisfying all other eligibility requirements.

5. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of four

(4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Index :Yes / No 25.03.2026 Internet :Yes / No NCC :Yes / No 3/5

cmr To The District Collector, Sivagangai District, Sivagangai.

4/5

HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J.

cmr 25.03.2026 5/5