← Library
Madras High CourtCRL RC(MD)/439/2020dismissed

Raguvaran v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-08-05Honourable Mrs Justice R. Tharani2 pages

Crl. R.C.(MD)No.439 of 2020 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATE : 05.08.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. THARANI Crl. R.C.(MD)No.439 of 2020 Raguvaran ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Inspector of Police Utchipuli Police Station Ramanathapuram District.

(Crime No.355 of 2020)

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Assistant Director, Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram Taluk, Ramanathapuram.

... Respondents Prayer : This criminal revision case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.4444 of 2019 dated 22.01.2020 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram and modify the onerous conditions.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Vikram For Respondents : Mr.K.Dinesh Babu Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This revision has been filed to call for the records pertaining to the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.4444 of 2019 dated 22.01.2020 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram and modify the second condition.

2. On the side of the petitioner, it is stated that the trial Court passed that order for return of the vehicle on condition that to deposit a sum of Rs. 50,000/- to the credit of the District Minerals Foundation Trust and request that the condition to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1 / 2

Crl. R.C.(MD)No.439 of 2020 relaxed and the amount may be reduced to Rs.25,000/-.

3. On the side of the prosecution, it is stated that in all similar cases an amount not below Rs.50,000/- was imposed, as a condition for the return of the vehicle and he objected to the relaxation of that condition.

4. A perusal of the records reveals that the offence involved is under Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act and the condition imposed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge is reasonable and there is no necessity to modify the condition.

5. Hence, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (AS) // True Copy // / /2020 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Ls NOTE: In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To

1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Ramanathapuram.

2. The Inspector of Police ,Utchipuli Police Station Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram,Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Assistant Director,Tamil Nadu Mines and Minerals, Ramanathapuram,Ramanathapuram District.

5.The Tahsildar,Ramanathapuram Taluk,Ramanathapuram. Crl. R.C.(MD)No.439 of 2020 05.08.2020 AP(04/09/2020) 2 P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2 / 2