Madras High CourtCONT P(MD)/711/2022closed

Vishnupriya v. Seenivasan Ips

2022-06-17Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

Cont. P(MD)No.711 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 17.06.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN Cont. P(MD)No.711 of 2022 in W.P.(MD)No.3109 of 2022 Vishnupriya ... Petitioner/Petitioner Vs.

Seenivasan, IPS The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

... Respondent/1st Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for willfully and deliberately committing contempt of Court by disobeying the order of this Court passed in W.P.(MD)No.3109 of 2022, dated 17.02.2022. Prayer in WP(MD). 3109 of 2022 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court To issue Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents not to interfere in the petitioner`s access right to the petitioner`s rented shop and to not to interfere in rental dispute by initiating appropriate action on the petitioner`s representation dated 28.1.2022 and pass such further other order or orders as this Hon`ble Court may deem fit and proper as to the facts and circumstances of this case.

For Petitioner :

Mr.T.A.Ebenezer For Respondent :

Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel on either side.

2. I am more than satisfied that there is nothing further to adjudicate in this contempt petition. Stair case which was demolished has been reconstructed. The petitioner's grievance is that his mobile phone and key is still retained by the local inspector. If that be so, the petitioner has to file only a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

Cont. P(MD)No.711 of 2022 separate writ petition and no further relief can be granted in this petition.

3. The contempt petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) // True Copy // /07/2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) rmi Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

To Seenivasan, IPS The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

+1 CC to M/s.SPL.GP ( SR-27179[F] dated 21/06/2022 ) ORDER MADE IN Cont. P(MD)No.711 of 2022 in W.P.(MD)No.3109 of 2022 17.06.2022 srk(CO) TR(04.07.2022) 2P 3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2