Arumuga Raj v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Thirty First day of March Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5561 of 2016 ARUMUGA RAJ ..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.3 Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO. 3 OF 2016) ..RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/R R.ANAND Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.01.2016 for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, r/w 120(B) of IPC in Crime No.3 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. Heard Mr.R.Anand, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State.

3.It is seen that this petitioner was arrested on 18.01.2016 and he is in incarceration since then. Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, subject to the following conditions: (i) the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, No.I, Tirunelveli. [ii] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police everyday at 10.30 a.m. until further orders.

[iii] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[iv] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[v] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[vi] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as to whether the petitioner is complying with the condition or not. sd/- 31/03/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, TIRUNELVELI. 2 -do-thro'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUNELVELI. 3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI. 4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CITY CRIME BRANCH, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. 5 THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL PRISON, PALAYAMKOTTAI, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/R R.ANAND Advocate SR.No.18174 ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.5561 of 2016 Date :31/03/2016 PBK/GSV-PM/AR-I 31/03/2016 ::2P-7C::

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/