← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6931/2021granted

Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police

2021-05-19Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19/05/2021 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN Manikandan ... Petitioner//Sole Accused Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police, Devakottai Town Police Station, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.101/2021). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.S.M.Sanjay, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Muthumanickam, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.101/2021 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 447, 427, 379 (NP) and 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.101 of 2021 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.Heard both sides.

3.Due to matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and the defacto complainant, the petitioner scolded the defacto complainant in filthy language and also threatened her. Hence, this case has been registered.

4.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case and hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

1/3

5.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are husband and wife and the wife filed H.M.O.P petition before the Sub Court, Devakottai, which is pending and subsequent to that the alleged occurrence is said to have taken place. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are husband and wife and due to matrimonial dispute, the occurrence said to have been taken place, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner on certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest by the respondent police on executing personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the respondent police and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Devakottai, and execute a fresh personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- [Rupees Ten Thousand only] with two sureties each for a likesum to the satisfaction of the concerned Judicial Magistrate, within a period of one month, from the date of resumption of regular work in subordinate Courts, in view of the present pandemic situation and on further conditions that:

(a)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; (b)the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police, once in two weeks i.e., on Monday, at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 19/05/2021 / TRUE COPY / / /2021 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DEVAKOTTAI 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

3.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVAKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

4.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.6931 of 2021 Date :19/05/2021 LS/MRN PK/MNR/SAR-III/25.05.2021 : 3P/5C 3/3