Rajkumar v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the First day of April Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.5601 of 2016 1 RAJKUMAR 2 PALANIKUMAR ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED (RANK NOT KNOWN) Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ODAIPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

CR.NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No.not known of 2016, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(i) IPC, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 3.It is seen that the injured is treated as out patient and there is no previous case against the petitioners.

4.Taking into consideration the nature of the allegation against these petitioners, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, anticipatory bail is granted, but with conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthammapalayam, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a) the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police every day at 6.30 p.m. until further orders.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[e] The Inspector of Police concerned is directed to send compliance report to the office of the Government Advocate (Crl. Side) as to whether the petitioners are complying with the condition or not. sd/- 01/04/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, UTHAMMAPALAYAM, 2 DO THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

3 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE ODAIPATTI POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

+1. CC to M/S R.MATHIYALAGAN Advocate SR.No.18436.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.5601 of 2016 Date :01/04/2016 AM/NGM.SS/SAR-I/05.04.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/