← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/5952/2024disposed of

Subburam v. The Inspector Of Police

2024-09-19Honourable Mr Justice K.Murali Shankar6 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 19.09.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.4459 and 4460 of 2024 1.Subburam 2.Ashok @ Ashok Balaji 3.Jegan Balaji 4.Ashok Velsamy 5.Jeyaraman 6.Vigneshwaran ... Petitioners Vs.

1.State rep by The Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

(Crime No.153 of 2015) 2.Vigneshwaran ... Respondents PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records of the impugned proceedings in C.C.No.1 of 2022 on the file of learned Subordinate Judge, Aruppukottai and quash the same as illegal.

1/6

For Petitioners : Mr.S.Selva Aditya For R1 : Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R2 : Mr.K.Jeyamohan

ORDER

The Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking orders to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.1 of 2022 pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aruppukottai.

2. The case of the prosecution is that there existed business dispute between the parties and that on 14.06.2015, the petitioners along with other accused had attacked the second respondent and four others and also threatened them with dire consequences.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the second respondent has lodged a complaint before the first respondent and on that basis, FIR came to be registered in Crime No.153 of 2015 and after completing the investigation, the first respondent has 2/6

filed the charge sheet against 8 persons including the petitioners and the case was taken on file in C.C.No.1 of 2022 for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(2) IPC and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act against the petitioners/accused 1 to 6 and is pending on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aruppukottai.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the first respondent would submit that against the accused 7 and 8 the case was ordered to be split up and is pending in P.R.C.No.9 of 2019 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Aruppukottai.

5. The case is under trial. By passage of time, the parties have decided to bury their hatchet and compromise the dispute amicably among themselves.

6. A Joint Memo of Compromise has been filed before this Court which have been signed by the petitioners, the second respondent and four injured persons and also by their respective counsels. The 3/6

petitioners, the second respondent and the injured persons are present before this Court and they were identified by Mr.S.Ravi Eswaran, Special Sub Inspector, Aruppukottai Taluk Police Station, as well as by the learned counsels appearing for the parties. This Court also enquired both the parties and was satisfied that the parties have come to an amicable settlement between themselves.

7. In the instant case, it is a business dispute and the parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter, the High Court has to power to quash the complaint for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(2) IPC and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act.

8. The legal position expressed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Panjab and another reported in (2012)10 SCC 303 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbathbhai Vs. State of Gujrath) reported in (2017)9 SCC 641 were taken into consideration.

9. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments 4/6

of the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceedings in C.C.No.1 of 2022 as against the petitioners pending before the Subordinate Court, Aruppukottai, even though, the offences involved are not compoundable in nature.

10. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is allowed and the proceedings in C.C.No.1 of 2022, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Aruppukottai, is quashed as against the petitioners and the joint compromise memo shall form part and parcel of this order. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 19.09.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No csm To 1.The Subordinate Court, Aruppukkottai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Aruppukottai Taluk Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

5/6

K.MURALI SHANKAR,J.

csm Order made in and Crl.M.P.(MD)Nos.4459 and 4460 of 2024 Dated: 19.09.2024 6/6