← Library
Madras High CourtREV.APLC(MD)/10/2019dismissed

E.Venugopal Rao, v. The Union Of India,

2022-09-28Honourable Mrs Justice J. Nisha Banu,Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 28.09.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH and C.M.P.(MD) No.665 of 2019 E.Venugopal Rao ... Review Petitioner / Appellant Vs.

1.The Union of India, Rep. through the Director General, Railway Protection Force, Railway Board, New Delhi.

2.The Inspector General, Railway Protection Force, Railway Board, New Delhi.

3.The Commandant (Commanding Officer) 5.BN/RPSF/TPJ, Head Quarters, No.5, Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, Tiruchirapallli, (TN).

4.Assistant Commandant-II, 5.BN/RPSF/TPJ, Head Quarters, No.5, Battalion, Railway Protection Special Force, Tiruchirapallli, (TN).

5.The Enquiry Officer & Inspector, "A" Company, 5.BN/RPSF/TPJ, Railway Protection Special Force, Tiruchirapallli, (TN).

6.S.Ramachandran, The Then Head Constable "D" Company, 5.BN/RPSF/TPJ, Railway Protection Special Force, Tiruchirapallli, (TN).

... Respondents/Respondents PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 and Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the order dated 24.02.2017 made in W.A.(MD) No.603 of 2011.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thirumurthy

ORDER

J. NISHA BANU, J.

AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

We do find any error apparent on the face of the order, dated 24.02.2017 passed in the W.A.(MD) No.603 of 2011 and hence, we are not inclined to proceed further in this review application.

2. In view of the above, this review application stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

[J.N.B, J.] & [N.A.V., J.] 28.09.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No rm

J. NISHA BANU, J.

AND N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

rm 28.09.2022