← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/10752/2018granted

Shanmugam v. The Inspector Of Police

2018-06-29Honourable Mr Justice G.R.Swaminathan2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Ninth day of June Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.10752 of 2018 1 SHANMUGAM 2 RAJA 3 MURUGARAJ ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED 1 to 3 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAPETTAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.124/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.S.RAJAPRABU Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences under Sections 379 of I.P.C and Section 21

(1) of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 in Crime No.124 of 2018.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent.

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that there are no previous cases pending against the petitioners herein.

4..Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Papanasam and on their executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

5.The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 29/06/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PAPANASAM, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THANJAVUR DISTRICT AT KUMBAKONAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE AMMAPETTAI POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.S.RAJAPRABU Advocate SR.No.11721 TSG JAM/04/07/2018/ RR/RNB/ 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.10752 of 2018 Date :29/06/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/