Chellapandiyammal v. The Inspector General Of Registration

1 W.P.(MD)NO.9211 OF 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.06.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN W.P.(MD)No.9211 of 2022 and W.M.P.(MD).6576 of 2022 Chellapandiyammal ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District.

4. Pandiammal

5. Veeralakkammal ... Respondents Prayer: Writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the second respondent to cancel the sale deed document No.1029/1998 dated 16.12.1998 registered at the third respondent's Sub Registrar Office.

1/5

2 W.P.(MD)NO.9211 OF 2022 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Murugappan For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.K.S.Selva Ganesan, Additional Government Pleader.

* * *

O R D E R

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 to 3.

2. The petitioner has given a representation before the second respondent for cancelling the sale deed (document No. 1029 of 1998) dated 16.12.1998 registered on the file of the third respondent. The fourth respondent is the executant of the said document. The fifth respondent is the purchaser. According to the petitioner, without any right or title the fourth respondent has executed the said sale deed.

3. I am afraid that the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted. Of course the registering authority is 2/5

3 W.P.(MD)NO.9211 OF 2022 empowered to hold an enquiry in the cases of fraudulent registration. If there has been impersonation or furnishing of fake documents, then and then alone, registration can be termed as fraudulent.

4. It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satya Pal Anand Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Ors. [(2016) 10 SCC 767] that the party aggrieved by the registration of the document executed by holder of imperfect title can challenge the same before the jurisdictional civil Court. The registering authority after registration cannot cancel the same. The Writ of Mandamus can be issued only, if the authority concerned omits or neglects to discharge their statutory duty. In view of the aforesaid decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the registering authority lacks the power to cancel a registered document. Therefore, the relief sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted.

5. This writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to move the jurisdictional civil Court for appropriate relief. I make it clear that the dismissal of the writ 3/5

4 W.P.(MD)NO.9211 OF 2022 petition will not in any way affect the rights of the petitioner. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.06.2022 Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No PMU To:

1. The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai 600 028.

2. The District Registrar, District Registration Office, Dindigul, Dindigul District.

3. The Sub Registrar, Sub Registrar Office, Sanarpatti, Dindigul District.

4/5

5 W.P.(MD)NO.9211 OF 2022 G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.

PMU W.P.(MD)No.9211 of 2022 06.06.2022 5/5