← Library
Madras High CourtSA(MD)/127/2019withdrawn dismissed

S.Kulasekarapandian, v. Arun Nagarajan,

2022-04-20Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy2 pages

S.A.(MD).No.127 of 2019 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.04.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY S.A.(MD).No.127 of 2019 and C.M.P.(MD).Nos.3207 and 5951 of 2019 1.S.Kulasekarapandian 2.S.Balachandran : Appellants / Respondents 1 & 2 / Plaintiffs Vs.

1.Arun Nagarajan : 1st Respondent / Appellant / 1st Defendant 2.The District Collector, Madurai District.

3.The District Revenue Officer, Madurai District.

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Madurai.

5.The Tahsildar, Vadipatti Taluk, Madurai District.

: Respondents 2 to 5 / Respondents 3 to 6 / Defendants 2 to 5 PRAYER: Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. praying to set aside the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.168 / 2014 dated 03.04.2017 on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Madurai, passed against the judgment and decree in O.S.No.128 of 2012 dated 01.09.2014 on the file of the District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Vadipatti.

For Appellants : Mr.M.V.Venkataseshan For Respondents : Mr.A.Arumugam

J U D G M E N T

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants submitted that the matter has been settled out of this Court and a letter dated 13.04.2022 has been circulated by his client and the same has also been produced before this Court. Hence, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Second Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 1/2

S.A.(MD).No.127 of 2019 2.In view of the above, the Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS I) // True Copy // / /2022 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) tsg NOTE:

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned. To 1.The Principal Sub Judge, Madurai 2.The District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti.

3. The Record Keeper, V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.M.V. VENKATASESHAN, Advocate ( SR-19959[F] dated 21/04/2022 ) S.A.(MD).No.127 of 2019 Dated:20.04.2022 MGJ(10.05.2022) 2P 6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 2/2